Where Did Dan Weiss Metropolitan Museum of Art Grow Up

For the by twelvemonth, Daniel H. Weiss's official title at the Metropolitan Museum of Art has been president and CEO. But one might say that his functional role has really been RAF: as in, Responsible Adult, Finally.

Originally brought on in 2015 as the successor to the redoubtable Met president Emily Kernan Rafferty, Weiss was first charged with helping then-manager Thomas Campbell chart the museum'southward choppy fiscal and administrative waters. And then, when the board decided last year that Campbell—a tapestry skillful who suffered a staff wildcat after trying to push through a new $600 million Modernistic and contemporary wing amid cuts to traditional sectors—was overmatched past the job, Weiss became charged with righting the institution's finances and finding a new manager.

At present, in the months since Campbell's departure, Weiss has launched an across-the-lath revamp of the museum'southward revenue streams—including a vastly controversial elimination of pay-what-yous-wish access for out-of-town visitors—and hired a human being he sees every bit a dream director: Max Hollein, an Austrian-absolute 5-tool histrion who has made high-caliber contemporary and classic art programming generate revenue for institutions in both Europe and America.

Of course, while Weiss is Hollein'south champion, some say he might exist 1 of the challenges for the incoming director likewise. Because instead of relinquishing his CEO championship to Hollein to grant him the sweeping authority enjoyed by Met directors since the reign of Philippe de Montebello—and most major museum directors—he will remain on as an equal partner in an unusual museological duumvirate.

It'south vital that this unorthodox organisation work, considering the Met finds itself at a critical juncture in its recent history, when it needs to shake off the droppings of its tumultuous last few years and chart a sustainable class through a challenging new era. Pundits who have weighed in on the key challenges the Met is facing at present have pointed to its need to safeguard its financial future and the riddle of how to engage with new art. But there is a third test that is equally (if non more) pressing: the need to evolve forth with a swiftly shifting society at large.

To find out about Weiss'due south vision for the Met'south path forwards, artnet news editor-in-main sabbatum downward with the CEO—an MBA-toting fine art historian who previously served as the president of Haverford College (and Lafayette Higher before that)—to discuss how he envisions this new bicameral era with Hollein to function. Part 2 of the interview, which can be read hither, focuses on Weiss's have on the many (other) challenges facing the Met.

The biggest museological news of the yr has been the appointment of Max Hollein equally new director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Can you tell me well-nigh the decision-making procedure that led to his pick? How did he match what you were looking for?

In some ways, nosotros call back of each director as first a new affiliate, or generation, in the life of the museum. This was that kind of decision for the states—a paradigm decision. And Max addresses and responds to our concerns in very significant means.

Beginning of all, he's a very experienced leader of great achievement at a variety of different cultural institutions in diverse locations in the world. And then, that told u.s.a.: this is an adaptable, capable, experienced leader—and it'south clear that he is those things. Max'due south own particular intellectual interests lend themselves especially to the Met. Because he is a big thinker, and he'south an ambitious thinker. He's self-confident only open-minded. He has a certain humility that slap-up leaders have, which is one of the things I saw him every bit a candidate—that, on the ane paw, there'southward a recognition that there is much that he can acquire, but he inhabits the role and identity of a leader very comfortably.

And this is a task that will turn your head. Information technology's a very exciting position, and one wants a leader who's capable of living within that tension. I think Max has that. More than specifically, he brings an agreement of the Modern and contemporary fine art worlds that will allow him to work with our curatorial team, the public, and our supporters in means that will assist us navigate to the right strategic niche for us to occupy in the Modern art question. And so I'g very confident we fabricated a strong appointment for all those reasons.

A day at the Met. Photograph by Brett Beyer, courtesy of the Met.

It'southward articulate that Hollein has a deep, lived-in familiarity with Modern and contemporary art owing both to his museum experience and his upbringing, when his father's status gave him intimate access to the greatest artists of the era. How much of his mandate is going to involve increasing the museum'due south engagement with this kind of recent art?

Only as a part of a large portfolio of responsibilities. What makes the job such an heady ane—and also, in some ways, a daunting one—is that there'south a long list of very important things he has to be doing. Developing the right strategy and vision for Modern and contemporary, forth with [chairman of Modern and contemporary art] Sheena Wagstaff and her team, is just one of 35 things that are really important. And so, ane of the measures of the success of a leader a large, circuitous organization is the ability to concord all those dissimilar responsibilities in rest and get on with your day. I think he knows how to exercise that. He volition not be the head curator of our Modern plan. But having a potent vision at the right altitude of who we are and how Modern fine art fits into that is his responsibility.

I have to ask: In the course of your search process, did you e'er take any inclination to pull a Dick Cheney and say, "I'm the best candidate for this position" and take on the director role yourself? Because every bit an art historian who has spent time mastering the intricacies of this vastly complicated establishment, it must take been tempting to try to open up this new chapter of the museum's history yourself.

Well, I'll share with you the honest answer, which is that information technology didn't for a unmarried moment appeal to me to exist the director of the institution in the way that the role is divers. I feel very rewarded and challenged in the role that I play, which is every bit president, and I have an impact beyond the institution in ways that feel right to me. The function of the director is a different job, and I don't have experience in developing programs. I'm an art historian and I had a academy appointment, but I have not been a curator at a museum.

So, what I was looking for is a really strong managing director to be my partner. And, given Max's background, which is on the programmatic side and the directorial side of museums, simply also with administrative and management feel, and mine, with the administrative and direction experience but besides with a lot of content knowledge—I know what art history is—it's a terrific opportunity for a stiff partnership.

I'grand really proud of the fact that we had the opportunity in this process to effectively hire anyone in the world. Being the managing director of the Met is one of the great jobs and we made a superb engagement with a really strong person. There'southward no way that 1 can construe Max Hollein every bit a compromise. He isn't a compromise. He's a star. And that's what we need.

Did you run across discomfort from whatever of the candidates in terms of the power-sharing construction at the top of the institution?

There were questions that were raised by people who wanted to understand more. Nigh of the people that we talked to are sitting directors—and that means they are already CEOs or they have ultimate say-so in their establishment. And then several of them wanted to know how this would work if they were indeed going to be a partner while I held the championship of CEO—including Max. He had that question, and nosotros went off by ourselves and we had a long chat, and he had equally much insight and vision equally to how this would work as I did.

In a similar way, I had been a CEO for fifteen years at colleges and universities before I came here, simply I came with the agreement that I would work for Tom Campbell, who was CEO, considering I would exist his partner. That'south the view I take—and I call up everyone we took seriously totally got that. There wasn't anyone who wasn't willing to be a candidate for this position considering they couldn't have the letters on the menu.

The Great Hall of the Met. Photograph courtesy of the Met.

Over the course of a year, the Met has shifted from being led by a unmarried curator-cum-art historian—who came into the job without significant prior authoritative experience—to at present being run by two business-minded fine art historians with MBAs. It reminds me of Andy Warhol's line that "skilful business is the best art." Why was information technology necessary for the Met to make such a dramatic shift towards the marketplace?

To answer that question effectively, I remember ane needs a little bit of narrative. I was recruited to this position past Tom Campbell because he recognized that he needed someone who had deep business experience but too a very strong affinity for the mission of the establishment. I wasn't looking for this job. Only I know how to practice the administrative work, and I believe that leadership is an important matter for cultural institutions to thrive. So, I came to do that work. But when I think of myself, my own professional identity is as an fine art historian. That'south the most meaningful part of who I am.

Fast forwards to this search, when nosotros brought Max here. Nosotros were non looking for an MBA who likes fine art. We were looking for someone who could exist a managing director at the very highest level in the ways that we were discussing. Information technology so happens that Max'southward private formation includes an MBA, and Max would say—if he were in this room—that successful leadership of large, complex cultural organizations requires understanding and skill across that spectrum of activities. And I share that view, which is why I just said it for him. It just so happens that he has an MBA and I have an MBA—only that was not was not a prerequisite at all.

But I think it'due south foolhardy for anyone to think that an institution like the Metropolitan Museum of Art tin be run past people who don't have deep experience of how big, complex organizations function. This is as hard a job as they go far the world of cultural institutions, universities, nonprofits. This 1 is really challenging, and that experience and that cognition is a prerequisite to being successful.

Thomas Campbell entered the job on September 9th, 2008, and less than a week later Damien Hirst'due south Sotheby's sale inaugurated a new era of contemporary art domination—on the aforementioned day that the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy set the global economical crisis in motion. Those twin forces—contemporary fine art's ascent and spreading financial turmoil—seem to have laid the seeds for his troubles at the museum, since he had to lay off staff while at the same time pushing further and faster into contemporary art than the curatorial departments were prepared for. How would you describe the situation that Hollein will be inheriting when he joins the museum?

Well, when it comes to the challenges that Max will exist confronting, nosotros could list them. It'south Modern and contemporary, and what's the right program for the southwest wing of the building. We will be renovating that building and replacing that structure, because we must. That's something that's in front of us that's already a priority. Then, what's the ultimate resolution for our relationship to the Breuer, and what should we be doing there? There are lists of things like that.

In some ways, the more important question is: How will Max Hollein outline his vision and the style he wants to do the chore here at the Met? The curators, the public, the trustees, the donors, the staff—all of these people have a vested interest in the well-existence of this institution, and for Max to be successful, and for me to be successful as well. We have to articulate a vision for the institution that at some level embraces all those people. And when Tom Campbell took over he had specific challenges, too. We have unlike challenges now, but it's how you have a conversation with all the people who care near this place that will ultimately determine your success.

The interesting thing about Thomas Campbell is that he was elevated from the ranks of the curatorial staff so constitute himself met with a fractious staff that challenged some of his decisions, making information technology a struggle for him. What do y'all retrieve the staff will make of Max Hollein as somebody coming in from San Francisco—the first outsider to fill this post in threescore years—and why exercise you feel he will be more successful in terms of meshing with these many voices and positions within the staff?

With a part like director, where one comes from—inside the system or somewhere else—doesn't matter later on year or ii. What nosotros saw in Max that was a very, very successful global career, leading three quite unlike institutions in Frankfurt and so leading the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco—two museums—likewise as having had senior roles at the Guggenheim at the beginning of his career. He'southward adjustable, his ability to work productively with people across the arrangement is demonstrable, his effective intelligence is very high, and he knows how to be successful.

For me, that's the measure. When he gets to the Met he's going to take to build relationships—he's already begun to do this—and figure out what are the key questions in front of him. Information technology may non be the ones that nosotros're talking about. The get-go challenge is to effigy out the task, and he's done that really finer in Frankfurt and San Francisco. So, how do you do that job in a mode that works for him, and that works for the states? That'due south the real question.

It's like the management guru Clayton Christensen'south theory of the "task to be washed"—that that's the thing to effigy out outset, and all else devolves from that.

I retrieve and then. In my own experience, the first claiming is always the to the lowest degree obvious one: what, actually, is the job I was hired to practice? What actually are the issues that are earlier me? Being president or director is a category. How exercise you serve as the manager of the Louvre, or the British Museum, or the Met, or the Guggenheim—they're very unlike jobs. You lot've got to figure that out.

Andreas Achenbach's Sunset Afterward a Storm on the Coast of Sicily, 1853, is in the Met's collection. Prototype courtesy of the Met.

When information technology comes to split up role you and Hollein will share at the acme, one tin can imagine that you lot, equally CEO, will oversee the museum's financial and administrative operations while he runs the Met's world-class collections and curatorial functioning, shaping the way the encyclopedic drove is served to the public. Is that an apt style of describing the division of labor, or will it be more than porous? From all indications, for instance, Hollein is as blithe about the business organisation affairs equally he is about the curatorial side.

I call up that the roles are more interconnected than it might seem when one just reads the job descriptions, in part because of the individuals who are in those positions. Max, as you said, has great experience and skill on the directorial side—the programmatic and curatorial side—but he also is very interested in the business side. And I have deep interest in the curatorial and programmatic side likewise as the authoritative side.

So, my main sphere of responsibilities will be authoritative, managerial, financial, and his primary sphere responsibilities will be programmatic, curatorial, conservation, and all of that. But the points of intersection will take place every day. So I can't imagine that nosotros would be making major decisions effectually programming or acquisitions without talking to each other, in the aforementioned way that I'm not going to be making decisions effectually financial priorities or administrative facilities issues without talking to Max.

That'southward why the job volition be so interesting, because we all take a partnership that allows us to bounce ideas off each other and inform our determination-making more fully. That is what interested him, and it'due south what interests me.

Is there a template in another organisation or institution that y'all've encountered where this kind of leadership past equal partners thrived in the art museum field?

It'south not so obvious to me that at that place are practiced examples, because about art museums are a fraction of the size of the Met—they don't require that same kind of robust structure. The Getty has a president who is an fine art historian and it has a manager who's an art historian. I don't know how shut [J. Paul Getty Museum director] Tim Potts and [J. Paul Getty Trust CEO] Jim Cuno work together on a twenty-four hours-to-day basis. But that'southward the closest illustration I can recall of.

There are other examples of organizations that are run by partners in the private sector too as in the nonprofit sector. I've seen it done in my own career, and information technology depends on being very thoughtful and somewhat cocky-conscious almost how one thinks almost roles, and and so having actually good chemistry between the people. And I'm confident that we've got both of those.

One of the things that impressed me about Max was how quickly he got a handle both the opportunities and the issues that a relationship like this would raise. Information technology was something that we got really excited nearly on several occasions, and I was very pleased Max said in one of his early interviews afterwards he was announced that he didn't see this as a burden but actually every bit an opportunity, andsomething of a relief—considering these are lonely jobs. And I feel the same style. So, information technology's a bit of an experiment, merely I remember the risk of failure is very, very low.

In San Francisco, Hollein started every bit manager while Diane B. Wilsey handled CEO duties, but a serial of events led to him taking on both roles. Practice you envision a state of affairs where you lot would cede the CEO title to him equally well?

We oasis't talked about what the downstream scenarios are. I came to the Met equally president and chief operating officer, so when Tom left I was asked to be chief executive officer, which I agreed to exercise. I am qualified and competent to atomic number 82 an art museum by virtue of my background my experience, and then I agreed to do it on those terms. We have now brought on a director to be my partner. As for what happens in the time to come, we have not explored unlike structures, but the organization volition go on to evolve. I'm very comfortable that, whoever holds the CEO championship, Max is my partner, and that's how we will operate on a day-to-solar day ground.

Much of your work over the by year has involved overhauling the Met'due south finances, pulling back from a brink where some say the museum's debt threatened to approach $40 million. The current annual operating deficit is roughly $x one thousand thousand, and the goal is to bring that to cipher by 2020. Where do you see the almost gamble right now when it comes to the Met'due south fiscal security?

Well, as you said, we've put together a very robust fiscal plan to go usa to a counterbalanced budget by 2020. We're on very good path to doing that. To do it requires two things, and then I'll come up to your take chances question. One is that at that place has to be a potent long-term agreement of finances in gild to make some sense of the globe nosotros're going through. In other words, it'south non enough to make decisions each year to create a upkeep—you have to take a long-term view. You're a perpetual establishment, we're supposed to be hither forever, and then we need to think out over five to 10 years in our planning to make sure that we're on the correct trajectory, and we that we don't see some major issue up ahead.

The Met as seen from 5th Avenue. Photo courtesy of the Met.

And that was non the case earlier?

No. That was something that I brought when I came: a longer-term financial model. Then we take a 10-yr financial model that is extremely thoughtful, very sophisticated, and as we recall about adding curators, or investing in facilities, or renting the Breuer, or whatever nosotros're doing, we await at how that plays out in various kinds of financial scenarios over time. That'south one.

The second upshot is that for an institution similar the Met to exist healthy, there has to be a diverse source of robust funding, and nosotros have that. We have to go revenue from our endowment. Nosotros do fundraising annually. We have an admissions program. We accept restaurants. We have retail. Nosotros have various kinds of revenue-generating activities. That diversity of sources allows us to be independent—so, no one owns u.s.. If were getting 90 percentage of our funding from the government—and we get less than x percent from the Metropolis of New York—it would have an effect on our programme, and it would have an event on our identity. The diverseness of funding gives us independence.

So, the risk areas that I worry about the most are that, on the one manus, nosotros can sustain long-term excellence, and that we have enough multifariousness in our funding that we tin can continue to take the programming and independence that makes united states what we are. That means every ane of those funding sources is of concern to me. Is the city going to be able to proceed to back up us at the level that they have? Are we able to generate enough revenue from our own activities? Is our fundraising going to be stiff? Will the public go along to support us? And then, there'southward no 1 detail adventure area, only it'southward holding all of those in residual that'south actually important.

I noticed that the retail operation at the Met has only recently roughly broken even, which is one division that you would certainly desire to be a moneymaker. That suggests there are at to the lowest degree some obvious places to increase profitability at the museum.

Over the concluding couple of years we were losing money in retail in a significant manner, and nosotros've turned it around. We've brought in a new leadership team, and we've created a new strategy. Nosotros've addressed some of the operational challenges that we had in that location, and we're on a path to having retail exist a robust, potent contributor to our overall financial picture. But retail is a challenging business—information technology's non the solution. It'due south one slice of a larger puzzle. And our goal for retail is that it should be as high-performing equally any museum-related retail performance is and held in balance with other things. Nosotros're on a path to getting there. But we have some turnaround work to do.

I would imagine that the biggest challenge for having a 10-year financial prospectus is getting atomic number 26-clad promises from the board that they're willing to underwrite this 10-year vision, and that their support will be unwavering over this menstruation. Is that something that you were able to get?

Yes, it is. The financial programme that we're describing, looking out over 10 years, includes certain assumptions virtually how much revenue we're going to get from admissions, how much revenue nosotros're going to get from restaurants, and how much money we're going to raise from our board.

And actually a subtext of the Met'due south keen success story is the generosity of the board and our major donors who take made this establishment what information technology is. That's of import. And I say this with some frequency: When this museum was created 147 years ago, there was no fine art. None. Unlike the British Museum or the National Gallery in London or the Louvre—they all had royal or purple collections to draw from. We had naught. All of the art came from gifts from trustees and donors. So as we look out over 10 years, we take certain assumptions about how much money we will heighten from them. They've always been at that place for us. And I think they will continue to be.

Between you and Max, who will have the near twenty-four hour period-to-twenty-four hours or week-to-week contact with the board members?

Oh, it'south very much a shared responsibility. Max and I both concord seats on the lath—that's office of these positions—and Max and I volition meet regularly, as I do now, with the chair of the lath, Dan Brodsky. Nosotros meet biweekly, and Max will join those meetings now. We both will take lots of interaction with the board. The discussions we take with them will be a little bit different, but the interaction will be regular.

This is the first installment of a two-office interview. You can read the 2d half here.

Follow Artnet News on Facebook:

Want to stay ahead of the art world? Subscribe to our newsletter to get the breaking news, eye-opening interviews, and incisive critical takes that drive the conversation forward.

lawrencewertiout.blogspot.com

Source: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/metropolitan-museum-of-art-ceo-dan-weiss-on-the-museums-next-steps-1280066

Share this post